<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Perception Archives - Aksconsult</title>
	<atom:link href="https://aksresolution.com/tag/perception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://aksresolution.com/tag/perception/</link>
	<description>Neutral Services &#38;  Negotiations Expertise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 17:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>When the Other Side Stops Replying: Reading Silence in a Negotiation</title>
		<link>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/silence-in-a-negotiation/</link>
					<comments>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/silence-in-a-negotiation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marina Akchurina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 17:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Negotiation Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical Awareness]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aksresolution.com/?p=534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When a counterparty stops responding in a negotiation, most people interpret it as bad news. It rarely is that simple. Silence in a business negotiation carries information, but the information depends entirely on what kind of silence it is. Reading it correctly, rather than reacting to it, is what separates a stalled negotiation from one that simply slowed down.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/silence-in-a-negotiation/">When the Other Side Stops Replying: Reading Silence in a Negotiation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aksresolution.com">Aksconsult</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/silence-in-a-negotiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Counterparts Test You in the First Twenty Minutes</title>
		<link>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/reading-your-counterpart-in-negotiation/</link>
					<comments>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/reading-your-counterpart-in-negotiation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marina Akchurina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Negotiation Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical Awareness]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aksresolution.com/?p=503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The first twenty minutes of a commercial negotiation are not relationship-building. They are diagnostic. Experienced negotiators use routine opening moves to test your preparation, urgency, alternatives, and process awareness. Most people miss this entirely. By the time the parties start discussing substance, the information asymmetry is already in place.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/reading-your-counterpart-in-negotiation/">How Counterparts Test You in the First Twenty Minutes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aksresolution.com">Aksconsult</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/reading-your-counterpart-in-negotiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negotiating from a Weaker Position: Recurring Mistakes in Asymmetric Commercial Negotiations</title>
		<link>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/negotiating-from-a-weaker-position/</link>
					<comments>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/negotiating-from-a-weaker-position/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marina Akchurina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Negotiation Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asymmetric Negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perception]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aksresolution.com/?p=497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When the other side holds most of the formal power, the weaker party's outcome is determined less by that asymmetry than by a small number of recurring, self-inflicted mistakes. Stronger counterparties rarely need to win the negotiation. They need the weaker side to lose ground unnecessarily, and most of the time it does.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/negotiating-from-a-weaker-position/">Negotiating from a Weaker Position: Recurring Mistakes in Asymmetric Commercial Negotiations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aksresolution.com">Aksconsult</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/negotiating-from-a-weaker-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power and Leverage in High-Stakes Negotiations</title>
		<link>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/power-and-leverage-in-high-stakes-negotiations/</link>
					<comments>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/power-and-leverage-in-high-stakes-negotiations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marina Akchurina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Negotiation Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Dynamics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aksresolution.com/?p=375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In high-stakes negotiations, the party with more leverage is not always the larger or more powerful one. Leverage is rarely where it appears to be, and it rarely stays where it starts. Understanding how it actually forms, and how it shifts, is what separates a well-prepared negotiator from one who mistakes position for advantage.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/power-and-leverage-in-high-stakes-negotiations/">Power and Leverage in High-Stakes Negotiations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aksresolution.com">Aksconsult</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aksresolution.com/negotiation-strategy/power-and-leverage-in-high-stakes-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
